Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised.
Robert Elliott; Christine M. Fox; Svetlana A. Beltyukova; Gregory E. Stone; Jennifer Gunderson; Xi Zhang
Rasch analysis was used to illustrate the usefulness of item-level analyses for evaluating a common therapy outcome measure of general clinical distress, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1994). Using complementary therapy research samples, the instrument's 5-point rating scale was found to exceed clients' ability to make reliable discriminations and could be improved by collapsing it into a 3-point version (combining scale points 1 with 2 and 3 with 4). This revision, in addition to removing 3 misfitting items, increased person separation from 4.90 to 5.07 and item separation from 7.76 to 8.52 (resulting in alphas of .96 and .99, respectively). Some SCL-90-R subscales had low internal consistency reliabilities; SCL-90-R items can be used to define one factor of general clinical distress that is generally stable across both samples, with two small residual factors.
Robert Elliott, Christine M. Fox, Svetlana A. Beltyukova, Gregory E. Stone, Jennifer Gunderson, & Xi Zhang (2006). Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised.. Psychological Assessment, 18(4), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.359