Back to publications

extended · article · 2024

Rasch modelling vs. item facility: implications on the validity of assessments of Asian EFL/ESL vocabulary knowledge and lexical sophistication modelling

Liang Ye Tan; Stuart McLean; Young Ae Kim; Joseph P. Vitta; William P. Fisher Jr.

This study examines how second/foreign language (L2) word difficulty estimates derived from item response theory (IRT) and classical test theory (CTT) frameworks are virtually identical in the context of vocabulary testing. This conclusion is reached via a two-stage process: (a) psychometric assessments of both approaches and (b) L2 word difficulty modelling with lexical sophistication. Using data collected from first/native language (L1) Japanese EFL learners, both approaches led to similar conclusions in terms of the psychometric properties of the construct. Furthermore, CTT- and IRT/Rasch-derived estimates for word difficulty yielded nearly identical results in the predictive models. Although the “CTT-vs-IRT” debates in the past few decades have concluded with a middle ground agreed upon in most educational settings, this study acts as a useful demonstration to L2 vocabulary researche...

DIFCATEducationLanguage TestingPsychology
APA citation

Liang Ye Tan, Stuart McLean, Young Ae Kim, Joseph P. Vitta, & William P. Fisher Jr. (2024). Rasch modelling vs. item facility: implications on the validity of assessments of Asian EFL/ESL vocabulary knowledge and lexical sophistication modelling. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00327-8