Comparison of Classical Test Theory vs. Multi-Facet Rasch Theory in writing assessment
Murat Polat; Nihan Sölpük Turhan; Çetin Toraman; George Engelhard Jr.
Testing English writing skills could be multi-dimensional; thus, the study aimed to compare students’ writing scores calculated according to Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Multi-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM). The research was carried out in 2019 with 100 university students studying at a foreign language preparatory class and four experienced instructors who participated in the study as raters. Data of the study were collected by using a writing rubric consisting of four components (content, organization, grammar and vocabulary). Participants' writing scores were analysed thoroughly both by CTT and MFRM. At the first step, the participants’ writing scores were calculated by taking the means of the writing points given by the graders in the CTT model. Then, the MFRM was applied to the data through a three-facet design considering the rater, student and rubric components as MFRM facets respect...
Murat Polat, Nihan Sölpük Turhan, Çetin Toraman, & George Engelhard Jr. (2022). Comparison of Classical Test Theory vs. Multi-Facet Rasch Theory in writing assessment. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.21