Back to publications

extended · article · 2021

Setting a standard for low reading proficiency: A comparison of the bookmark procedure and constrained mixture Rasch model

Tabea Feseker; Timo Gnambs; Cordula Artelt; George Engelhard Jr.

In order to draw pertinent conclusions about persons with low reading skills, it is essential to use validated standard-setting procedures by which they can be assigned to their appropriate level of proficiency. Since there is no standard-setting procedure without weaknesses, external validity studies are essential. Traditionally, studies have assessed validity by comparing different judgement-based standard-setting procedures. Only a few studies have used model-based approaches for validating judgement-based procedures. The present study addressed this shortcoming and compared agreement of the cut score placement between a judgement-based approach (i.e., Bookmark procedure) and a model-based one (i.e., constrained mixture Rasch model). This was performed by differentiating between individuals with low reading proficiency and those with a functional level of reading proficiency in three ...

DIFCATEducationPsychologyMedicine
APA citation

Tabea Feseker, Timo Gnambs, Cordula Artelt, & George Engelhard Jr. (2021). Setting a standard for low reading proficiency: A comparison of the bookmark procedure and constrained mixture Rasch model. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0257871-e0257871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257871